Friday, January 20, 2006
WIkipedia to the rescue -- Part 2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b455c/b455cc8df220e44486e19ae59ac15228f4a24d62" alt=""
The paper found a bunch of incidents of plagiarism from different sources, but what apparently tipped them off was when "an attentive Wikipedia editor noted similarities between a Wikipedia article and one of Ryan's columns," reports Slashdot's CmdrTaco.
Alas, as so often happens, the heroes failed to get their due. While the "Star-Bulletin has admitted to the plagiarism, they failed to publicly acknowledge that Wikipedia was responsible for bringing this situation to light," Slashdot notes.
In other words, they used Wikipedia's reporting without crediting it. What's that called again?